Social Vulnerability Assessment of Disaster Risks in Manay, Davao Oriental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64612/ijecsdv.v1i1.177Keywords:
Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Geographic Information System (GIS), Multi-hazard Vulnerability AssessmentAbstract
This study examined the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) of Manay, Davao Oriental, in relation to earthquake, landslide, and flooding hazards. Despite increasing exposure to multiple hazards, localized and integrated assessments of socio-economic and spatial drivers of vulnerability at the barangay level remain limited, resulting in gaps in disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) planning. A mixed-methods approach was employed, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine indicator weights and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques to map the spatial distribution of vulnerability. Quantitative data from survey respondents were triangulated with qualitative insights from key informant interviews (KII) and focus group discussions (FGDs). Results indicate that vulnerability is spatially heterogeneous and shaped by both environmental and socio-economic conditions. Lower SVI values were associated with higher adaptive capacity; barangays with lower SVI values had high adaptive capacity and resilience, whereas barangays with higher exposure and sensitivity had higher SVI. The barangay of San Fermin had the highest SVI value for earthquakes (0.9992), and the barangay of Manreza had the lowest (0.3132). For landslide hazards, San Fermin also had a very high vulnerability (0.965), while Manreza had a low vulnerability (0.318). For the flooding hazard, Central has a highly vulnerable score (0.7779), and Concepcion has a moderate score (0.548). Overall, 58% of the barangays evaluated had high SVI for earthquake, 69% were found highly vulnerable to landslides, and 33% were highly vulnerable to flooding. Barangays with high population density, hazard-prone locations, and limited resources consistently exhibited higher vulnerability. The findings highlight that social vulnerability is multi-dimensional, spatially clustered, and socially embedded, underscoring the need for integrated, place-based DRRM strategies.
References
Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Aksha, S. K., Juran, L., Resler, L., & Zhang, Y. (2019). An analysis of social vulnerability to natural hazards in Nepal using a modified Social Vulnerability Index. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 10, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0192-7
Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., & Welle, T. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards, 67, 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5
Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (2005). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006
Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
Cutter, S. L., & Finch, C. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(7), 2301–2306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710375105
Engle, N. L. (2011). Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019
Fatemi, F., Ardalan, A., Aguirre, B., Mansouri, N., & Mohammadfam, I. (2017). Social vulnerability indicators in disasters: Findings from a systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.006
Gaillard, J. C., & Pangilinan, M. L. C. J. (2010). Participatory mapping for raising disaster risk awareness among the youth. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 18(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00607.x
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
Rafieian, M., Korrat, I., & Nadi, S. (2019). Spatial analysis of social vulnerability to earthquake hazards in urban areas. Sustainability, 11(18), 4914. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184914
Ramli, M. W. A., Alias, N. E., Mohd Yusof, H., Yusop, Z., & Taib, S. M. (2021). Development of a local integrated disaster risk assessment framework for Malaysia. Sustainability, 13(19), 10792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910792
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2019). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/5f8f4f2f-en
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
Yin, H., Xiang, Y., Lei, Y., & Xu, J. (2024). Analysis of social vulnerability to earthquake disasters in mountainous areas: A case study of sixteen cities along the fault zone in Sichuan Province, China. Sustainability, 16(15), Article 6479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156479
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vincent Jay S. Padillo, Nympha E. Branzuela, Marvin A. Batiancela, Chrithopher V. Famor, Lorena L. Sabino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
