Teaching Eco-Innovation: A Key Challenge for Sustainable Development

Authors

  • Nahid Alaamri Cadi Ayyad University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.35

Keywords:

education, innovation, educational policies

Abstract

The integration of eco-innovation into educational programs is examined in this study, with a focus on how important it is for student training and the promotion of sustainable development. Applying organizational and technology solutions to lessen environmental effect is known as eco-innovation, and it is viewed as a strategic tool for increasing students' knowledge of today's ecological issues. The study presents a pedagogical revolution based on an interdisciplinary approach that integrates science, technology, economics, and social sciences, proving via a literature analysis and case studies that eco-innovation goes beyond simple awareness-raising.  Additionally stressed is the use of active educational techniques like experiential pedagogy and project-based learning. Depending on national circumstances, the use of eco-innovation varies, according to research on environmental and educational policy.  Countries in Europe, North America, and Asia seem to be more developed than underdeveloped nations, where systemic obstacles such inadequate financing and training for teachers still exist.  This study offers a number of best practices that have been drawn from global experiences, such as the significance of a collaborative approach that involves all parties involved and the use of adaptable curriculum that integrate ideas of social responsibility and ecological transition.

References

Alamandi, M. (2025). Sustainable Innovation Management: Balancing Economic Growth and Environmental Responsibility. Sustainability, 17(10), 4362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104362

Audretsch, D. B., & Fiedler, A. (2024). Bringing the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship to circular economies: Knowledge and values in entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Small Business Journal, 42(4), 480-505. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426231218357

Audretsch, D., Belitski, M., & Fiedler, A. (2025). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship and innovation: taking stock and new directions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10215-9

Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of cleaner production, 65, 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039

Cariaga, R., & ElHalaissi, M. (2024). Enhancing Graduate Employability and Social Impact Through Culturally Responsive Social Business Education and Design Thinking: A Global Perspective. Available at SSRN 4943411. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4943411

Cariaga, R., Pospos, R. S., & Dagunan, M. A. S. (2024). Educational Experiences on Numeracy Education Using Information and Communication Technology Tools, Remedial Education Programs, And Creative Teaching Methods: A Qualitative Inquiry in Rural Areas. Remedial Education Programs, And Creative Teaching Methods: A Qualitative Inquiry in Rural Areas (May 17, 2024). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941115

Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of cleaner production, 18(10-11), 1073-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014

Charina, A., Kurnia, G., Mulyana, A., & Mizuno, K. (2022). Sustainable education and open innovation for small industry sustainability post covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040215

Citaristi, I. (2022). United Nations Development Programme—UNDP. In The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2022 (pp. 183-188). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292548

del Río González, P. (2009). The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda. Ecological economics, 68(3), 861-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.004

Ebzeeva, Y. N., & Smirnova, Y. B. (2023). Contemporary trends in educational policy: UNESCO higher education roadmap. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 23(2), 329-337. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-2-329-337

Espuny, M., Reis, J. S. D. M., Giupponi, E. C. B., Rocha, A. B. T., Costa, A. C. F., Poltronieri, C. F., & Oliveira, O. J. D. (2025). The role of the triple helix model in promoting the circular economy: Government-led integration strategies and practical application. Recycling, 10(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020050

Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 1(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002

Jirapong, K., Cagarman, K., & von Arnim, L. (2021). Road to sustainability: University–start-up collaboration. Sustainability, 13(11), 6131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116131

Le, P., Nguyen, T. N., & Le, C. (2024). Navigating the green path: the role of climate incentives in shaping eco-innovation and firm policies. In Climate Governance and Corporate Eco-innovation: A Framework for Sustainable Companies (pp. 65-96). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56423-9_2

Lee, B. X., Kjaerulf, F., Turner, S., Cohen, L., Donnelly, P. D., Muggah, R., ... & Gilligan, J. (2016). Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. Journal of public health policy, 37(Suppl 1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-016-0002-7

Naz, A., & Aslam, M. (2023). Green innovation, globalization, financial development, and CO2 emissions: the role of governance as a moderator in South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(20), 57358-57377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26527-y

Peralta, A. (2022). Lean Startup and Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Review of the Customer Development Process. Business Models for the Circular Economy: A European Perspective, 81-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08313-6_4

Sanchez-Henriquez, F., & Pavez, I. (2021). The effect of open innovation on eco-innovation performance: The role of market knowledge sources. Sustainability, 13(7), 3890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073890

Speckemeier, L., & Tsivrikos, D. (2022). Green entrepreneurship: should legislators invest in the formation of sustainable hubs?. Sustainability, 14(12), 7152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127152

Sun, J., Wu, H., & Shi, S. (2025). Research on the relationship between higher education, technological innovation, and green Economy—Analysis based on Chinese data from 2011 to 2020. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(2), 8546-8587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02226-y

Yang, X., Liao, S., & Li, R. (2021). The evolution of new ventures’ behavioral strategies and the role played by governments in the green entrepreneurship context: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(24), 31479-31496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12748-6

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Alaamri, N. (2025). Teaching Eco-Innovation: A Key Challenge for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(5), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.35

Issue

Section

Articles