Peer Review Policy

VIT follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, objectivity, and academic quality.

Editorial Screening

Manuscripts are initially screened for:

• Relevance to the journal’s scope
• Originality and scholarly contribution
• Technical and methodological quality
• Compliance with formatting and ethical standards
• Similarity and plagiarism detection

Double-Blind Review

• Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.
• Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
• Reviewers assess originality, technical merit, clarity, significance, and ethical compliance.

Editorial Decisions

Editorial decisions may include:

• Accept
• Minor Revision
• Major Revision
• Reject

Final decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief based on reviewer recommendations and editorial assessment.