Peer Review Policy

AJEV implements a double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, quality, and academic integrity.

Editorial Screening

Submitted manuscripts are initially evaluated for:

• Relevance to the journal’s scope
• Originality and scholarly contribution
• Compliance with formatting and ethical standards
• Similarity and plagiarism screening

Double-Blind Review

• Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.
• Manuscripts are evaluated by at least two qualified reviewers.
• Reviewers assess methodological rigor, originality, clarity, significance, and ethical compliance.

Editorial Decision

Possible editorial decisions include:

• Accept
• Minor Revision
• Major Revision
• Reject

Final publication decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief based on reviewer recommendations and editorial evaluation.