Peer Review Policy

EJEV follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, objectivity, and scholarly quality.

Editorial Screening

Submitted manuscripts are initially evaluated based on:

• Relevance to the journal’s aims and scope
• Originality and scholarly contribution
• Methodological rigor and academic quality
• Compliance with formatting and ethical requirements
• Similarity and plagiarism screening

Double-Blind Review

• Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.
• Manuscripts are evaluated by at least two qualified reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript topic.
• Reviewers assess originality, significance, clarity, methodology, and ethical compliance.

Editorial Decisions

Editorial decisions may include:

• Accept
• Minor Revision
• Major Revision
• Reject

The Editor-in-Chief makes the final publication decision based on reviewer recommendations and editorial evaluation.