Teachers’ Communicative Language Competence and Teaching Performance in Relation to Academic Achievement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64612/ijev.v2i1.168

Keywords:

communicative language competence, teaching performance, academic achievement, Classroom Observation Tool, secondary education

Abstract

Teachers’ communicative language competence, teaching performance, and students’ academic achievement at Maparat National High School during School Year 2025–2026 were examined using a quantitative descriptive–correlational research design. The study assessed teachers’ communicative language competence in terms of grammatical, discourse, sociolinguistic, and strategic competence; teaching performance based on the Department of Education Classroom Observation Tool; and students’ academic achievement using their General Weighted Average (GWA). Data were gathered from selected public secondary school teachers through a validated communicative language competence questionnaire, official classroom observation records, and school academic records. Descriptive statistics, particularly the mean, and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation were used for data analysis. Results revealed that teachers demonstrated a high level of communicative language competence and a very high level of teaching performance, while students achieved a satisfactory level of academic performance. However, no significant relationships were found between teachers’ communicative language competence and students’ academic achievement or between teaching performance and students’ academic achievement. Consequently, predictive analysis was not conducted. The findings indicate that although teachers exhibit strong communicative competence and effective teaching performance, these factors alone do not significantly influence students’ academic achievement. The study recommends strengthening academic interventions, continuous teacher professional development, and student support programs, while encouraging future research to investigate other factors affecting academic achievement.

References

Aguilar, J. M., & Rütti-Joy, O. (2023). Language Teaching in the’Third Space’: Identity Trajectories and Professional Development Needs. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 33, 99-114. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1380642

Alzoraiki, M., Ahmad, A. R., Ateeq, A. A., Naji, G. M. A., Almaamari, Q., & Beshr, B. A. H. (2023). Impact of teachers’ commitment to the relationship between transformational leadership and sustainable teaching performance. Sustainability, 15(5), 4620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620

Andrews, S. (2003). Teacher language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language Awareness, 12(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410308667068

Arndt, H. L., & Kusyk, M. (2026). Informal second language learning. Language Teaching, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444826101219

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Cariaga, R. (2025). Constructivism in Online Learning: A Qualitative Thematic Meta-Synthesis. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(6), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i6.53

Cariaga, R., & Gerodias, E. (2025). More Than Homework Help: Filipino Secondary Students’ Lived Experiences of Parental Involvement and Academic Performance. International Journal of Educational Viewpoints, 1(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijev.v1i1.52

Cariaga, R., Sabidalas, M. A., Dagunan, M. A., Refugio, C., Cariaga, V., Gerodias, E., & Cubero, G. (2025). Challenges of Pre-service Teachers in K–12 Classrooms: An Explanatory Case Study. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(6), 732–737. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i6.54

Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y. S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021). Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027

Cubero, G., & Cariaga, R. (2026). Sustainability Analysis of Parents’ Participation in School Governance and Educational Quality. International Journal of Economics, Culture, and Sustainable Development Viewpoints, 1(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijecsdv.v1i1.181

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Derakhshan, A., Kruk, M., Mehdizadeh, M., & Pawlak, M. (2021). Boredom in online classes in the Iranian EFL context: Sources and solutions. System, 101, 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102556

El Halaissi, M., & Cariaga, R. (2026). Sustainability Analysis of Instructional Leadership Practices and Educational Quality. International Journal of Economics, Culture, and Sustainable Development Viewpoints, 1(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijecsdv.v1i1.180

Galloway, N., Numajiri, T., & Rees, N. (2020). The internationalisation, or Englishisation, of higher education in East Asia. Higher Education, 80(3), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00486-1

Hasumi, T., & Chiu, M. S. (2024). Technology-enhanced language learning in English language education: Performance analysis, core publications, and emerging trends. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2346044. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2346044

Heydarnejad, T., Tagavipour, F., Patra, I., & Farid Khafaga, A. (2022). The impacts of performance-based assessment on reading comprehension achievement, academic motivation, foreign language anxiety, and students’ self-efficacy. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00202-4

Hyland, K. (2024). Ken Hyland’s essential bookshelf: Academic writing. Language Teaching, 57(3), 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000118

Littlewood, W., & Shufang, W. (2022). The Role of Learners’ First Language in the Foreign Language Classroom. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 31, 174-182. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1359152

MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teacher psychology. Language Teaching, 53(4), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000258

Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., van der Werf, G., Creemers, B. P. M., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2021). State of the art—Teacher effectiveness and professional learning. Educational Research Review, 33, 100389. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885451

Richards, J. C., Panahi, A., & Mohebbi, H. (2023). Language Teaching Research Quarterly. Language Teaching Research, 33, 4-67.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Suarez, J. M., & Idul, M. (2026). Teachers’ Communicative Language Competence and Teaching Performance in Relation to Academic Achievement. International Journal of Educational Viewpoints, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijev.v2i1.168

Issue

Section

Articles