School Heads' Administrative and Instructional Leadership as Predictors of the Performance of Teachers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64612/ijev.v2i1.170

Keywords:

Administrative leadership, Instructional leadership, Teacher performance, School leadership, Educational management

Abstract

This study examined the influence of school heads’ administrative and instructional leadership on teachers’ performance in selected elementary and secondary schools in Bunawan, Agusan del Sur. Specifically, it determined the levels of administrative leadership, instructional leadership, and teachers’ performance, and examined the relationships and predictive effects among these variables. The study employed a quantitative, non-experimental descriptive-correlational research design. Data were collected from teachers using a validated survey questionnaire and analyzed through descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation, and Multiple Linear Regression. Findings revealed that school heads demonstrated very high levels of administrative and instructional leadership, while teachers exhibited high levels of performance across key professional domains. Correlation analysis indicated that neither administrative leadership nor instructional leadership had a statistically significant relationship with overall teachers’ performance. Likewise, regression analysis showed that most leadership dimensions did not significantly predict teacher performance. However, personnel and professional attributes and interpersonal effectiveness emerged as significant predictors of teachers’ performance. These findings suggest that teacher performance is influenced by multiple factors beyond leadership practices alone, emphasizing the importance of supportive professional relationships and effective interpersonal interactions within schools. The study concludes that strengthening interpersonal effectiveness and fostering positive professional attributes among school leaders may enhance teacher performance. It recommends sustained leadership development initiatives and further research examining additional organizational and individual factors that influence teacher performance.

References

Bacus, R. C., Picardal, M. T., Perez, N. B., & Balo, V. T. M. (2024). Predictors of beginning teachers' teaching performance. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1375726. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1375726

Bhuttah, T. M., Xusheng, Q., Abid, M. N., & Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing student critical thinking and learning outcomes through innovative pedagogical approaches in higher education: The mediating role of inclusive leadership. Scientific Reports, 14, 24362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75379-0

Cariaga, R., Dagunan, M. A., & Cariaga, V. (2026). Sustainability Analysis of School Resource Management and Educational Quality. International Journal of Economics, Culture, and Sustainable Development Viewpoints, 1(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijecsdv.v1i1.179

Cariaga, R., Dagunan, M. A., Cariaga, V., Sabidalas, M. A., El Halaissi, M., & Bacatan, J. (2025). Rethinking Parental Involvement in Developing Countries: Toward Inclusive and Culturally Responsive Education. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(5), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.39

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cubero, G., & Cariaga, R. (2026). Sustainability Analysis of Parents’ Participation in School Governance and Educational Quality. International Journal of Economics, Culture, and Sustainable Development Viewpoints, 1(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijecsdv.v1i1.181

Damanik, J., & Widodo, W. (2024). Unlocking teacher professional performance: Exploring teaching creativity in transmitting digital literacy, grit, and instructional quality. Education Sciences, 14(4), 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040384

El Halaissi, M., & Cariaga, R. (2026). Sustainability Analysis of Instructional Leadership Practices and Educational Quality. International Journal of Economics, Culture, and Sustainable Development Viewpoints, 1(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijecsdv.v1i1.180

Fidan, T. (2025). Organizational Predictors of Teachers’ Subjective Well-Being: Multinational Evidence from PISA 2022 Data. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251362956. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251362956

Hsieh, C. C., Chen, Y. R., & Li, H. C. (2024). Impact of school leadership on teacher professional collaboration: Evidence from multilevel analysis of Taiwan TALIS 2018. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-01-2023-0002

Hsieh, C. C., Khau, A. H., & Li, H. C. (2025). Impact of school leadership on teacher autonomy: Evidence from multilevel analysis using Vietnam TALIS 2018 data. Sage Open, 15(3), 21582440251363814. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251363814

Kalkan, Ü., Altınay Aksal, F., Altınay Gazi, Z., Atasoy, R., & Dağlı, G. (2020). The relationship between school administrators’ leadership styles, school culture, and organizational image. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244020902081. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902081

Kumar, R. (2024). Motivation, work experience, and teacher performance: A comparative study. Acta Psychologica, 245, 104217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104217

Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Schumacker, R. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “The four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772

Luo, X., Alias, B. S., & Adnan, N. H. (2024). Exploring the interplay between teacher leadership and self-efficacy: A systematic literature review (2013–2024). Education Sciences, 14(9), 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090990

Martín-Alguacil, N., & Avedillo, L. (2024). Student-centered active learning improves performance in solving higher-level cognitive questions in health sciences education. International Medical Education, 3(3), 346-362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ime3030026

Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. Prospects, 52(3), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09625-6

Olvido, M. M. J., Dayagbil, F. T., Alda, R. C., Uytico, B. J., & Rodriguez, K. F. R. (2024, February). An exploration of the quality of graduates of Philippine teacher education institutions. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 9, p. 1235261). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1235261

Qian, M., Yu, X., Yang, J., & Yan, C. (2026). Distributed leadership and teachers’ social and emotional learning practices in Chinese schools: A relational coordination perspective using TALIS 2024 data. Behavioral Sciences, 16(4), 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040523

Saro, J., Pelesco, E., Abiao, J., Longaquit, J., Apique, J., & Palanog, J. G. (2025). Extent of Teachers’ Manifestation Toward Instructional Supervision and Assistance from School Leaders: Its Relationship to Students’ Academic Success. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(5), 604–630. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.38

Sison, J., & Simpal, E. A. (2025). Assessment on the Professional Competence and Teaching Performance OF SEAMEO Innotech Guro21 Course 1 Scholars In Region XII. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(5), 595–603. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.37

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Patosa, J., & Villocino , R. (2026). School Heads’ Administrative and Instructional Leadership as Predictors of the Performance of Teachers. International Journal of Educational Viewpoints, 2(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijev.v2i1.170

Issue

Section

Articles